Antibiotic regimens for treating acute pelvic inflammatory disease. An evaluation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2026

Acupoint Catgut Embedding for Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Due to the Sequelae of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Published on: May 3, 2024
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.
Abstract:
A statistical analysis of 58 reports involving 101 clinical trials and over 4,000 patients revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the cure rates between single-agent and combination therapy. Also, there was no difference in the cure rates between antibiotic regimens that cover Chlamydia trachomatis and those that do not. However, there was a difference in cure rates when regimens with good antianaerobe activity were compared to those with poor coverage of anaerobes. There was a statistically significantly higher cure rate when "newer" regimens (mainly the second and third generations of cephalosporins and newer penicillins) were compared to "older" regimens (mainly penicillin and tetracycline). In 91 comparisons there were no statistically significant differences between regimens with a > 90% cure rate. Optimum therapy is discussed in terms of the cure rate, coverage of known pathogens and antibiotic toxicity. The original and revised recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease are also reviewed.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology
Urinary Tract Infection I: Introduction