Related Experiment Videos
Generic level relationships of the Papionini (Cercopithecoidea)
1Department of Anthropology, New York University, New York 10003.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
|May 1, 1994
Summary
Molecular data and chromosomal analyses reveal distinct evolutionary relationships within Old World monkeys (Papionini). Theropithecus and Papio are grouped together, excluding Mandrillus, challenging previous morphological hypotheses.
Area of Science:
- Primate evolutionary biology
- Molecular anthropology
- Systematics of Old World monkeys (Papionini)
Background:
- Morphological analyses have historically suggested a close relationship between Mandrillus and Papio.
- Phylogenetic placement of Theropithecus has been inconsistent across different analytical methods.
- Previous studies indicated potential paraphyly within the mangabey genus Cerocebus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To resolve incongruences between molecular and morphological phylogenetic hypotheses for Papionini.
- To clarify the evolutionary relationships among genera within the Papionini tribe.
- To reassess the taxonomic status of mangabeys based on molecular and chromosomal data.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of multiple molecular datasets including DNA sequences (e.g., cytochrome oxidase subunit II), DNA-DNA hybridization, and repetitive DNA patterns.
- Chromosomal banding analyses.
- Review and reanalysis of morphological characters previously used in phylogenetic studies.
Main Results:
- Molecular and chromosomal data consistently group Theropithecus and Papio together, excluding Mandrillus.
- Evidence confirms the paraphyletic nature of the genus Cerocebus, supporting the resurrection of Lophocebus.
- Morphological reevaluation aligns with the molecular and chromosomal consensus phylogeny.
Conclusions:
- The molecular and chromosomal data provide a robust phylogenetic framework for the Papionini tribe.
- The study refutes previous morphological hypotheses suggesting a close Mandrillus-Papio link.
- The findings necessitate taxonomic revisions, including the recognition of Lophocebus as distinct from Cerocebus.