Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effect of embedding methods versus fixative type on karyometric measures

M E Boon1, H G van der Poel, C J Tan

  • 1Leiden Cytology and Pathology Laboratory, The Netherlands.

Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology
|April 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Redefining robotic image-guidance - tomographic visualization of lesions during prostate cancer surgery via gantry-free robotic SPECT.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same author

Photographic assessment of urostomy characteristics after ileal conduit diversion: a feasibility study.

World journal of urology·2026
Same author

Oncological outcomes following PSMA PET/CT-guided salvage whole-pelvis radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer.

Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Flexible intraoperative detectors for robotic and laparoscopic image-guided surgery: a systematic review.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same author

Sexual functioning after penile cancer surgery: comparison between surgical approaches in a large patient cohort.

International journal of impotence research·2025
Same author

Prospective clinical study of sentinel node detection in bladder cancer using a hybrid tracer - Towards replacement of pelvic lymph node dissection in cases with sentinel node visualization on SPECT/CT?

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2025

Choosing the right tissue preparation method is crucial for accurate urologic tumor karyometry. Plastic embedding significantly impacts nuclear features more than fixation, offering superior results compared to paraffin embedding.

Area of Science:

  • Urologic Pathology
  • Histotechnology
  • Quantitative Cytology

Background:

  • Accurate karyometric analysis of urologic tumors relies on optimal tissue preparation.
  • Standard formalin fixation and paraffin embedding may introduce artifacts affecting nuclear morphology.
  • Alternative fixation and embedding techniques require evaluation for their impact on nuclear features.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of various fixation and embedding methods on the karyometric analysis of urologic tumor samples.
  • To compare routine formalin fixation with Carbowax and Kryofix fixatives.
  • To evaluate paraffin versus plastic (GMA) embedding, including secondary plastic embedding of archival material.

Main Methods:

  • Karyometric analysis of 12 preparatory techniques applied to seven urologic tumor samples.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of formalin, Carbowax, and Kryofix fixation methods.
  • Evaluation of paraffin and plastic (GMA) embedding, including cytocentrifuge preparations and Feulgen staining.
  • Assessment of two morphometric and five texture features in Feulgen-stained nuclei.

    • Main Results:

    • Both fixation and embedding methods significantly influenced nuclear light microscopic characteristics.
    • Embedding techniques demonstrated the most substantial karyometric differences.
    • Plastic (GMA) embedding resulted in more abnormally shaped tumor cell nuclei compared to paraffin.
    • Plastic embedding outperformed paraffin embedding across all three fixation methods.
    • Re-embedding archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material in plastic markedly altered nuclear features, especially nuclear area.

    Conclusions:

    • Nuclear features in urologic tumor samples are highly sensitive to the embedding method employed.
    • Plastic embedding is superior to paraffin embedding for preserving and analyzing nuclear morphology in karyometry.
    • The choice of embedding technique is a critical factor for reliable quantitative analysis of nuclear features in urologic pathology.