Rehabilitation resident academic productivity. Report on 1993 graduates

A survey was designed to explore the relationship among elective time (ET), residency research requirement (RR), mandatory research rotation (MR), and academic productivity for the 1993 graduating residency class. Sixty-seven of the 75 rehabilitation residency program directors listed in the 1993 Directory of Graduate Medical Education Programs responded (89% response rate). Data from 60 programs, representing 283 graduating residents, were analyzed (80% usable response rate). A resident was operationally defined as "active" if that individual submitted either articles (SART) for publication or abstracts (SABS) for oral/poster presentation during the training years; residents with accepted articles (AART) and/or abstracts (AABS) were defined as "productive." Odds ratios and chi 2 statistics were calculated for each study risk variable (ET, RR, MR) and the corresponding outcome variables (SART, SABS, AART, AABS). One hundred and fifty-nine residents (56%) submitted abstracts; 86 (30%) submitted articles; of these residents, 134 (47%) and 54 (19%) had their work accepted, respectively. Research was required by 26/60 (43%) programs. Research elective time was available in 41/60 (68%) programs; only 44/203 (22%) residents used this time for research. Residents who had research required had a 1.9 times greater likelihood of submitting both abstracts (P < 0.008) and articles (P < 0.014). No other study relationship was found to be significant. The study results suggest that implementing a research requirement in the residency training curriculum may lead to an increase in resident research activity.