Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are neuromotor systems conserved in evolution?

K K Smith1

  • 1Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. 27710.

Brain, Behavior and Evolution
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Environmental and lunar cues are predictive of the timing of river entry and spawning-site arrival in lake sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens.

Journal of fish biology·2012
Same author

Statistical analyses of developmental sequences: the craniofacial region in marsupial and placental mammals.

The American naturalist·2008
Same author

Early development of the neural plate, neural crest and facial region of marsupials.

Journal of anatomy·2001
Same author

Anxiolytic effects of kava extract and kavalactones in the chick social separation-stress paradigm.

Psychopharmacology·2001
Same author

Morphology and mechanics of tongue movement in the African pig-nosed frog Hemisus marmoratum: a muscular hydrostatic model.

The Journal of experimental biology·1999
Same author

Have gene knockouts caused evolutionary reversals in the mammalian first arch?

BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology·1998
Same journal

"Mind Over Muscle": Neural and Biomechanical Signatures of Expertise in Early Stone Tool Use.

Brain, behavior and evolution·2026
Same journal

A step forward in encephalization: the virtual endocast of the Middle Pleistocene hominin from Ceprano, Italy.

Brain, behavior and evolution·2026
Same journal

Anatomical and Volumetric Description of the Baird's Beaked Whale (Berardius bairdii) brain from Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Brain, behavior and evolution·2026
Same journal

Immunohistochemical Staining of the Brain of the Tuatara Sphenodon punctatus.

Brain, behavior and evolution·2026
Same journal

Macroevolutionary patterns of endocast lateralization in catarrhines and fossil hominins.

Brain, behavior and evolution·2026
Same journal

Phylogenetic patterns and genomic correlates of pronounced neocortical reduction in New World monkeys.

Brain, behavior and evolution·2026
See all related articles

Neuromotor conservatism hypotheses are tested, finding limited evidence for homologous neuromotor patterns in evolution. Existing data do not support the idea of a conserved feeding program in terrestrial vertebrates.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Neuroscience
  • Comparative anatomy

Background:

  • Hypotheses suggest neuromotor systems are evolutionarily conserved.
  • This relies on the assumption of homologous neuromotor patterns.
  • Testing these hypotheses requires rigorous phylogenetic and definitional criteria.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine hypotheses of neuromotor system conservation during evolution.
  • To assess the validity of neuromotor pattern homology as a fundamental assumption.
  • To evaluate specific cases and the broader hypothesis of a conservative feeding program in vertebrates.

Main Methods:

  • Review of criteria for testing homology hypotheses.
  • Application of these criteria to proposed cases of neuromotor conservatism.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of existing data concerning vertebrate feeding programs and evolutionary constraints.

    • Main Results:

    • Few studies adequately support neuromotor conservatism hypotheses due to incomplete data.
    • Lack of precise definitions for conserved neuromotor patterns hinders validation.
    • Insufficient phylogenetic breadth and detail in existing tests were identified.
    • Current data do not substantiate the hypothesis of a conservative feeding program in terrestrial vertebrates.

    Conclusions:

    • Convincing corroboration of neuromotor homology is rare due to methodological limitations.
    • Further research needs specific parameter definitions and robust phylogenetic analyses.
    • The proposed evolutionary constraint of a conservative feeding program in vertebrates is not supported by available evidence.