Related Experiment Videos
The development of a Weighted Objective Research Criterion Assessment Tool (WORCAT)
Curationis
|June 1, 1994
Summary
This study developed the WORCAT instrument for objective research report evaluation. Key findings highlight the significant weighting of recommendations (20%) and conclusions (10%) in assessing research quality.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Science
- Research Methodology
Background:
- Objective evaluation of research reports is crucial for academic and scientific integrity.
- Existing instruments may lack comprehensive criteria or appropriate weighting for research aspects.
- South African Nursing Science Departments require a standardized tool for assessing research quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an instrument for the objective evaluation of research reports.
- To establish criteria, relative weights, and identify critical errors in research reports.
- To determine the face validity and relative importance of different research aspects.
Main Methods:
- A tentative instrument was developed and distributed to 144 university lecturers and senior lecturers in South African Nursing Science Departments.
- Face validity of 18 research report aspects was assessed.
- The Analytic Hierarchical Procedure was employed to determine the relative weight of each aspect through matrix comparisons.
Main Results:
- The WORCAT (Weighted Objective Research Criteria Assessment Tool) was developed based on the findings.
- Recommendations were assigned the highest relative weight (20%).
- Conclusions (10%), literature study (10%), and problem statement (7%) also received significant weighting.
Conclusions:
- The developed WORCAT provides a structured approach to objectively evaluate research reports in Nursing Science.
- The weighting emphasizes the importance of actionable recommendations and sound conclusions in research.
- Further reliability testing of the WORCAT is recommended.