Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Within-event learning during filial imprinting

J J Bolhuis1, R C Honey

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, England.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whisker-mediated texture discrimination learning in freely moving mice.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2019
Same author

The nature of phenotypic variation in Pavlovian conditioning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2018
Same author

Perceptual learning with tactile stimuli in rodents: Shaping the somatosensory system.

Learning & behavior·2017
Same author

The origins of individual differences in how learning is expressed in rats: A general-process perspective.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2016
Same author

Erratum to: Renewal of extinguished instrumental responses: independence from Pavlovian processes and dependence on outcome value.

Learning & behavior·2016
Same author

Perceptual learning with tactile stimuli in rats: Changes in the processing of a dimension.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2016
Same journal

The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Pigeons use low rather than high spatial frequency information to make visual category discriminations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Associative models of instrumental learning: a response to Dupuis and Dawson.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
See all related articles

Newly hatched chicks learn faster through filial imprinting when visual and auditory stimuli are presented together. However, presenting auditory cues alone before or after weakens this visual imprinting preference.

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Developmental psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Filial imprinting is a crucial learning process in newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus).
  • Chicks exposed to a visual stimulus (V1) show a preference for it over a novel stimulus (V2).
  • In natural settings, visual stimuli are often paired with auditory cues, such as a hen's maternal call (A1).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how auditory stimuli affect visual filial imprinting in domestic chicks.
  • To determine if simultaneous or sequential exposure to visual (V1) and auditory (A1) stimuli influences imprinting preference.
  • To understand the role of within-event learning in potentiating filial imprinting.

Main Methods:

  • Chicks were exposed to visual stimulus V1 alone or in combination with auditory stimulus A1.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments involved simultaneous V1 and A1 exposure, followed by tests without A1.
  • Additional experiments tested the effect of presenting A1 before or after the V1-A1 compound exposure.

    • Main Results:

    • Simultaneous exposure to V1 and A1 potentiated chicks' preference for V1 when tested without A1.
    • Presenting A1 alone before or after the V1-A1 compound exposure reduced the chicks' preference for V1.
    • These results indicate that the potentiation effect is dependent on the temporal contiguity of stimuli during learning.

    Conclusions:

    • The potentiation of visual filial imprinting by auditory cues occurs through within-event learning.
    • This potentiation is diminished when auditory stimuli are presented separately from the visual stimulus during critical learning periods.
    • The findings highlight the importance of stimulus integration in early learning and memory formation.