Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Making a case for employer-enforced individual mandates

M V Pauly1

  • 1Health Care Systems Department, University of Pennsylvania.

Health Affairs (Project Hope)
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

An individual mandate for health insurance offers significant benefits over mixed employer/individual plans. It is simpler for the public, avoids administrative issues, and prevents negative employment impacts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Making sense of a complex system: empirical studies of employment-based health insurance.

International journal of health care finance and economics·2003
Same author

Premium variation in the individual health insurance market.

International journal of health care finance and economics·2003
Same author

Community benefits: how do for-profit and nonprofit hospitals measure up?

LDI issue brief·2003
Same author

Financial incentives and drug spending in managed care.

LDI issue brief·2003
Same author

From hospital to drugstore: insurance and the shift to outpatient care.

LDI issue brief·2003
Same author

Kenneth Arrow and the changing economics of health care. Forward.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2002

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Public policy analysis
  • Healthcare systems

Background:

  • The Clinton administration proposed a mixed employer and individual mandate for health insurance.
  • Employer mandates can lead to administrative complexities and potential adverse employment effects.
  • Understanding the economic incidence of different mandate types is crucial for policy design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the advantages of an employer-enforced individual mandate with a mixed employer and individual mandate.
  • To analyze the economic incidence and administrative feasibility of different health insurance mandate structures.
  • To evaluate the potential employment effects associated with employer-based mandates.

Main Methods:

  • Economic reasoning and analysis of health policy proposals.
  • Comparative policy analysis of different mandate structures.
  • Assessment of administrative complexities and voter comprehension.

Main Results:

  • Economic analysis indicates that the costs of employer mandates largely fall on workers.
  • The economic incidence of an individual mandate is equivalent to that of an employer mandate.
  • An individual mandate presents fewer administrative complexities and avoids negative employment effects.

Conclusions:

  • An employer-enforced individual mandate is advantageous compared to mixed approaches.
  • Individual mandates offer greater simplicity for voters and administrative efficiency.
  • Policies should consider the full economic and administrative implications of health insurance mandates.

Related Experiment Videos