Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pediatric critical care

J Burns1, J H Arnold

  • 1MICU Office, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

Current Opinion in Pediatrics
|June 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Critical care research explores shock and resuscitation therapies. Maximizing oxygen delivery for poor oxygenation remains controversial, while new cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques show no survival improvement.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interventions for the prevention and treatment of pes cavus.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2007
Same author

Community nurses and self-management of blood glucose.

British journal of community nursing·2007
Same author

Does stretching increase ankle dorsiflexion range of motion? A systematic review.

British journal of sports medicine·2006
Same author

Monitoring change in diabetes care using diabetes registers--experience from divisions of general practice.

Australian family physician·2006
Same author

Age, stability of the precorneal tear film and the refractive index of tears.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2005
Same author

Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2005

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Resuscitation Science

Background:

  • Extensive research focuses on improving therapies for shock and resuscitation.
  • Current resuscitation techniques have seen limited advancements in survival outcomes over the past 30 years.
  • Debates persist regarding the efficacy of specific treatments like monoclonal antibodies for septic shock and ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current state of research in critical care regarding shock and resuscitation.
  • To evaluate controversial hypotheses, such as maximizing oxygen delivery to improve survival in non-survivors.
  • To examine emerging and established therapeutic interventions, including monoclonal antibodies and ribavirin.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent controlled clinical trials and critical care literature.
  • Analysis of ongoing research into novel techniques supplementing basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
  • Examination of the reevaluation of monoclonal antibodies for endotoxin-induced septic shock.

Main Results:

  • The hypothesis that maximizing oxygen delivery converts non-survivors to survivors remains controversial.
  • New cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques have not demonstrated significantly different survival outcomes compared to standard methods.
  • The efficacy of monoclonal antibodies for septic shock and ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus infections is under continued debate.

Conclusions:

  • There is a need for further research to identify truly effective therapies for shock and resuscitation.
  • Current advancements in resuscitation techniques have not yet yielded significant improvements in survival rates.
  • Ongoing reevaluation of existing and novel treatments is crucial for advancing critical care.

Related Experiment Videos