Monitoring pairwise comparisons in multi-armed clinical trials
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
D A Follmann1, M A Proschan, N L Geller
1Biostatistics Research Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Abstract:
This paper proposes a method for monitoring multi-armed clinical trials on the basis of pairwise comparisons between arms. The set of pairwise test statistics is examined during the course of the trial in order to make decisions about hypotheses, continuation of treatment arms, and continuation of the trial. Strong control of the Type I error rate is achieved by modifying two-armed group sequential procedures of Pocock (1977, Biometrika 64, 191-199), O'Brien and Fleming (1979, Biometrics 35, 549-556), and Lan and DeMets (1983, Biometrika 70, 659-663) to multi-armed trials. In the fixed-sample situation, these methods reduce to either Dunnett's or Tukey's procedure for multiple comparisons. A simpler, more flexible approximation based on the Bonferroni inequality is suggested, as well as an analogue to a sequentially rejective procedure.
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...