Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy

F Bonanni1, J Reed, G Hartzell

  • 1Department of Surgery, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18103.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
|September 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The environmental impact of intravenous antimicrobial therapies: a comparison of OPAT and in-patient administration care pathways-right-to-reply.

JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2025
Same author

Autosomal recessive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with variants in TRIM63.

International journal of cardiology·2025
Same author

Patient-reported outcomes following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis performed in adolescence versus adulthood.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2024
Same author

Staff Perceptions on the Effectiveness of GRiP-S, a New Approach to Clinical Supervision Incorporating Safewards: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis.

Issues in mental health nursing·2024
Same author

A potential biomarker of radiosensitivity in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with combination external beam radiotherapy and radium-223.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2023
Same author

First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment.

Physical review letters·2023
Same journal

Breaking the Polytrauma-Brain Barrier: Using Point-of-Care Biomarkers in Severely Injured Trauma Patients.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Going the Extra Mile: Picking the Right Trauma Center Destination for Critically Injured Patients in a Mature State-Wide Trauma System.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

What Does It Mean for Surgeons to Be Flourishing?

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Tailor-Made Solution to Trimming Venous Thromboembolism Risk.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

NIH Funding in Surgical Artificial Intelligence: Who, What, Where, Why.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and Safety of Rezūm Water Vapor Thermal Ablation in Large and Small Prostates: A Multicenter Comparative Analysis of 2,725 Patients.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe alternative for simple appendicitis but offers no significant advantages over open surgery. It may increase infectious complications in complicated appendicitis cases.

Area of Science:

  • General Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Recent studies suggest advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy over open appendectomy.
  • A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate these potential benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare laparoscopic appendectomy with conventional open appendectomy.
  • To determine if laparoscopic appendectomy offers clear advantages in patient outcomes and resource utilization.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of patient charts from January 1990 to June 1992.
  • Comparison of 300 open appendectomies and 66 laparoscopic appendectomies.
  • Data analyzed included anesthesia/operative time, morbidity, pain, diet, hospitalization, cost, and return to activities.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • No significant differences in operative complications, postoperative morbidity, pain, or diet advancement.
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy had longer anesthesia times, operative times, and higher costs.
  • Complicated appendicitis treated laparoscopically had a 45.5% readmission rate due to infectious complications.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe alternative for simple acute appendicitis.
  • It is not superior to open appendectomy in terms of operative time, recovery, or cost.
  • Laparoscopic approach may be contraindicated for complicated appendicitis due to increased infectious complications.