Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Profiling physician practice: a potential for misuse
1Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
Abstract:
Profiling physician practice is not unfamiliar to hospital epidemiologists. Surgeon-specific postoperative wound infection rates have been used to monitor and improve the quality of surgical outcomes. However, concerns for small sample sizes, validity of methods for risk adjustment, and reliability of data collection methods along with other methodologic concerns have resulted in mixed opinions regarding physician profiling as a tool for improving quality of care. In light of pressures for healthcare reform and skepticism regarding physicians' decision making, it is unlikely that methodologic concerns will dissuade regulators and managers from expanding scrutiny of physician practice.
Insights
Physician profiling, like surgeon-specific infection rates, aims to improve surgical quality. Methodologic concerns exist, but healthcare reform pressures suggest scrutiny of physician practice will likely increase.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Epidemiology
- Surgical Quality Improvement
Background:
- Physician profiling is a known practice for hospital epidemiologists.
- Surgeon-specific postoperative wound infection rates are used for quality monitoring.
- Concerns include small sample sizes, risk adjustment validity, and data reliability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the role and challenges of physician profiling in healthcare quality improvement.
- To discuss the impact of methodologic concerns on physician profiling.
- To consider the future of physician practice scrutiny amidst healthcare reform.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on physician profiling and surgical outcomes.
- Analysis of methodologic challenges in risk adjustment and data collection.
- Discussion of the influence of healthcare reform on regulatory oversight.
Main Results:
- Physician profiling, particularly surgeon-specific infection rates, has been utilized for quality assessment.
- Significant methodologic concerns have led to varied opinions on its effectiveness.
- Despite concerns, regulatory and managerial pressures favor increased scrutiny of physician practice.
Conclusions:
- Methodologic limitations in physician profiling are acknowledged.
- Healthcare reform and skepticism towards physician decision-making are driving increased oversight.
- Expanded scrutiny of physician practice is anticipated despite existing challenges.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios

