Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis of factorial survival experiments

E V Slud1

  • 1Mathematics Department, University of Maryland, College Park 20742.

Biometrics
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

This study addresses methodological challenges in two-way factorial survival experiments using proportional hazards models. It explores hypothesis formulation, statistical test choices, and power comparisons for analyzing treatment effects and interactions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dependent competing risks and the latent-failure model.

Biometrics·1988
Same author

A comparison of reflected versus test-based confidence intervals for the median survival time, based on censored data.

Biometrics·1984
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Survival Analysis
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Two-way factorial designs are common in survival experiments.
  • Methodological issues can complicate the analysis of treatment effects and interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss new methodological issues in two-way factorial survival experiments.
  • To provide a framework for analyzing these designs using asymptotic theory for proportional hazards models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized asymptotic theory for proportional hazards models with two binary treatment covariates.
  • Examined log-rank, adjusted log-rank, and stratified log-rank statistics.
  • Assessed asymptotic correlations between test statistics for main effects.

Main Results:

  • Discussed proper formulation of null hypotheses and alternatives.
  • Evaluated asymptotic power for detecting main effects and interactions.
  • Compared power in 2x2 designs versus three-group trials.
  • Addressed analysis problems with early termination of treatment accrual.

Conclusions:

  • Highlights the complexity of analyzing two-way factorial survival data.
  • Emphasizes the need for careful consideration of statistical methods for accurate interpretation.
  • Provides guidance for robust analysis in challenging survival experiment scenarios.

Related Experiment Videos