Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prospective nonrandomized study of conventional versus laparoscopic appendectomy

O Reiertsen1, E Trondsen, A Bakka

  • 1Department of Surgery, Akershus Central Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway.

World Journal of Surgery
|May 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatio-temporal modulation of cortical activity during motor deadaptation depends on the feedback of task-related error.

Behavioural brain research·2024
Same author

Comment on "Apical Charge Flux-Modulated In-Plane Transport Properties of Cuprate Superconductors".

Physical review letters·2020
Same author

Directional discrimination is better for noxious laser stimuli than for innocuous laser stimuli.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2019
Same author

Efficacy and safety assessment of ERCP in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica·2018
Same author

Assessment of Mucosal Inflammation and Circulation in Response to Probiotics in Patients Operated with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis.

Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology·2017
Same author

Exploration of conditioned pain modulation effect on long-term potentiation-like pain amplification in humans.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2016

Laparoscopic appendectomy (minimally invasive surgery) shows comparable outcomes to conventional appendectomy for appendicitis. While conventional surgery had fewer complications, laparoscopic surgery offered a shorter operating time, necessitating further randomized trials.

Area of Science:

  • General Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Appendicitis remains a common surgical emergency.
  • Conventional appendectomy is the traditional surgical approach.
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy has emerged as a less invasive alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional appendectomy.
  • To evaluate differences in complication rates, operative time, and recovery periods.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study comparing 233 patients with suspected appendicitis.
  • Patients were assigned to conventional or laparoscopic appendectomy based on surgeon preference.
  • Data collected included operative details, complications, hospital stay, and convalescence.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 72 patients; conventional appendectomy in 97.
  • Conventional appendectomy had a higher rate of removing normal appendices (p < 0.01).
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy had a shorter operative duration (p < 0.05) but longer recovery (p < 0.05). Minor complications were more frequent with laparoscopy (p < 0.01), but major complications were similar.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy is a viable alternative to conventional appendectomy.
  • Further randomized controlled trials are required to definitively recommend one procedure over the other.