Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bar-code technology applied to drug-use evaluation

B J Zarowitz1, A Petitta, M Mlynarek

  • 1Department of Pharmacy Services, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202.

American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Managing the pharmaceutical industry-health system interface.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy·2002
Same author

Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis.

Cancer·2001
Same author

Search for new physics using QUAERO: a general interface to D0 event data.

Physical review letters·2001
Same author

Use of recombinant factor VIIa (NovoSeven) in patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia.

Seminars in hematology·2001
Same author

Bovine neosporosis: immunoblot improves foetal serology.

Veterinary parasitology·2001
Same author

Monitoring the fetal heart non-invasively: a review of methods.

Journal of perinatal medicine·2001
Same journal

National health care reform, Part 2: Response to pharmacists.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
Same journal

Validity of originality assessment.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
Same journal

Unit dose dispensing of chromic phosphate P 32 suspension.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
Same journal

Hydralazine injection still available.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
Same journal

Improved extemporaneous formulation of cyclosporine ophthalmic drops.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
Same journal

Paclitaxel diluent and the case of the slippery spike.

American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
See all related articles

Barcode technology efficiently tracked histamine H2-receptor antagonist use in critically ill patients. This method identified drug use patterns, adverse events, and drug interactions, aiding therapeutic recommendations.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Health Informatics
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Histamine H2-receptor antagonists are frequently used in critically ill patients.
  • Understanding their usage patterns, adverse effects, and drug interactions is crucial for patient safety.
  • Traditional data collection methods can be time-consuming and prone to errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate patterns in histamine H2-receptor antagonist use in intensive care units.
  • To determine the occurrence of adverse drug effects and drug interactions associated with these agents.
  • To assess the efficiency of bar-code technology in collecting clinical data for drug use evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • A bar-code system was implemented for data collection in intensive care units.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data included drug use, adverse events, and drug interactions for patients receiving H2-receptor antagonists.
  • Information was uploaded to a computer database for analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Data were collected for 207 patients over a two-month period.
    • Cimetidine was the most common H2-receptor antagonist, primarily for stress-ulcer prophylaxis.
    • Two drug interactions and six adverse drug reactions were identified; 92 recommendations were made.

    Conclusions:

    • Bar-code technology provides a fast and efficient method for evaluating H2-receptor antagonist use in ICUs.
    • This technology facilitates the collection of comprehensive data on drug use, adverse events, and interactions.
    • Automated data capture supports clinical decision-making and improves patient care through targeted recommendations.