Related Experiment Videos
The universities' research assessment exercise 1992: a second opinion
Lancet (London, England)
|September 11, 1993
Summary
University department heads provide assessments comparable to the UK University Funding Council. This method is faster and more cost-effective, suggesting a need to re-evaluate current academic assessment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Higher Education Administration
Background:
- University departments of general practice undergo regular assessments.
- The UK University Funding Council (UK UFC) is a key body for evaluating academic departments.
- Assessing academic departments is crucial for resource allocation and quality assurance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the assessments of general practice departments conducted by departmental heads versus the UK UFC.
- To evaluate the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of departmental heads' assessments.
- To inform potential revisions of current academic department assessment methodologies.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of assessment outcomes.
- Evaluation of assessment timelines and costs.
- Review of existing academic assessment frameworks.
Main Results:
- Little significant difference was found between departmental heads' assessments and UK UFC assessments.
- Departmental heads' assessments were demonstrably quicker.
- Departmental heads' assessments were more economical.
Conclusions:
- Departmental heads' self-assessments offer a viable alternative to external evaluations.
- Current methods for assessing academic departments may require reconsideration in light of more efficient alternatives.
- Implementing departmental head assessments could streamline the evaluation process for general practice departments.