Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure and ultrafiltration volume in CAPD

P Y Durand1, J Chanliau, J Gambéroni

  • 1Altir, Nancy, France.

Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Financial barriers and peritoneal dialysis].

Nephrologie & therapeutique·2009
Same author

[Infection peritonitis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: microbiological review during an four-year period].

Pathologie-biologie·2004
Same author

Immunochemical analysis of peritoneal dialysate in a patient with hypersensitivity to icodextrin.

Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis·2003
Same author

Hypersensitivity to icodextrin.

Allergy·2002
Same author

Optimization of fill volumes in automated peritoneal dialysis.

Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis·2000
Same author

[Factors determining the modality selection in dialysis].

Nephrologie·2000

Intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure (IPP) significantly impacts ultrafiltration (UF) volume during peritoneal dialysis. Higher IPP reduces UF, highlighting its importance in dialysis efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is a common treatment for end-stage renal disease.
  • Understanding factors affecting ultrafiltration (UF) is crucial for optimizing CAPD efficacy.
  • Intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure (IPP) is a potential, yet often overlooked, factor influencing UF.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure (IPP) and ultrafiltration (UF) volume in CAPD patients.
  • To quantify the impact of IPP on UF during a standard dialysis exchange.

Main Methods:

  • 34 CAPD patients underwent a 2-hour exchange with 2 L of 3.86% glucose dialysate.
  • Intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) was measured during inspiration and expiration in a resting, supine position.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Intraperitoneal volume and overall UF were recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean IPP was 13 cmH2O, with a mean intraperitoneal volume of 2820 mL and mean UF of 744 mL.
    • A significant negative linear correlation was found between mean IPP and UF volume (r = 0.66; p = 0.0001).
    • Each 1 cmH2O increase in mean IPP was associated with a 70 mL reduction in UF over 2 hours.

    Conclusions:

    • While osmotic pressure drives UF in peritoneal dialysis, intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure plays a significant, influential role.
    • IPP should be considered a critical factor in managing and optimizing ultrafiltration in CAPD patients.
    • Further research may explore methods to modulate IPP for improved dialysis outcomes.