Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

A Mouse Model to Assess Innate Immune Response to Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Published on: February 28, 2019
Effect of scrubbing and irrigation on staphylococcal and streptococcal counts in contaminated lacerations
J M Howell1, H S Dhindsa, T O Stair
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C. 20007-2197.
Abstract:
We studied the effects of scrubbing with poloxamer 188 (SCR), irrigating with povidone iodine (PI), and scrubbing followed by irrigation (SCR-PI) on staphylococcal and streptococcal counts in inoculated guinea pig lacerations. PI irrigation and SCR-PI significantly lowered streptococcal counts (P < 0.05). Staphylococcal counts were not different from those in controls.
Insights
Poloxamer 188 scrubbing and povidone iodine irrigation were tested on guinea pig wounds. Povidone iodine treatments significantly reduced streptococcal bacteria but did not affect staphylococcal counts.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Wound Healing
- Infectious Disease
Background:
- Bacterial contamination of wounds poses a significant risk.
- Effective wound cleansing is crucial for preventing infection.
- Staphylococcal and streptococcal species are common wound pathogens.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of poloxamer 188 scrubbing (SCR) and povidone iodine irrigation (PI) in reducing bacterial load in wounds.
- To compare the effects of SCR, PI, and a combined SCR-PI approach on specific bacterial counts.
Main Methods:
- Guinea pig lacerations were inoculated with Staphylococcus and Streptococcus.
- Treatments included scrubbing with poloxamer 188, irrigation with povidone iodine, or a combination.
- Bacterial counts were assessed post-treatment.
Main Results:
- Povidone iodine irrigation (PI) and the combined scrubbing-irrigation (SCR-PI) significantly reduced Streptococcus counts (P < 0.05).
- Neither SCR nor PI/SCR-PI treatments demonstrated a significant reduction in Staphylococcus counts compared to controls.
Conclusions:
- Povidone iodine irrigation is effective in reducing Streptococcus contamination in wounds.
- Current methods show limited efficacy against Staphylococcus in this model.
- Further research is needed to develop effective strategies against staphylococcal wound infections.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Response II: Inflammatory Exudate and Tissue Repair
The typical wound exudate is odorless, transparent, straw-colored, thin, and watery. Exudate, however, can differ depending on the state of wound healing. Likewise, the exudate's...
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Handwashing II: Pre-procedure and Initial Procedure Steps
The hand washing procedure itself includes the following steps. First, cover cuts, if any, on hands with a waterproof dressing. Cuts and abrasions can become contaminated with bacteria hindering the ability to clean the area thoroughly. In addition, repeated hand washing can worsen an injury. The nails must be short and clean, without nail paint...
Surface Membrane Barriers
The outer layer of the skin, the epidermis, is a robust barrier comprising layers of closely packed keratinized cells. This dense arrangement prevents microbes from penetrating the body. The periodic shedding of epidermal cells...
Staphylococcal Skin Infections

