Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multicomponent models in body composition research: opportunities and pitfalls

T G Lohman1, S B Going

  • 1Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.

Basic Life Sciences
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

This study addresses multicomponent body composition models, highlighting their potential and pitfalls. Future research using presented theoretical, methodological, and statistical approaches can resolve controversies and improve body composition analysis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cross-sectional associations between adipose tissue depots and areal bone mineral density in the UK Biobank imaging study.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2021
Same author

Association of objectively measured physical activity and bone health in children and adolescents: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020
Same author

Physical activity, sedentary time, and longitudinal bone strength in adolescent girls.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020
Same author

Body Composition Methodology in Sports Medicine.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2018
Same author

Nutritional Practices of Coaches in the Big Ten.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2017
Same author

Use of iDXA spine scans to evaluate total and visceral abdominal fat.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2017

Area of Science:

  • Human body composition analysis
  • Biomedical modeling
  • Nutritional science

Background:

  • Multicomponent body composition models offer valuable insights into body composition.
  • Previous research has been limited by theoretical, methodological, and statistical pitfalls.
  • Variability in fat-free mass (FFB) composition and new method validity (e.g., DXA) remain debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present theoretical, methodological, and statistical considerations for evaluating multicomponent body composition models.
  • To identify opportunities for multicomponent approaches in validating new methods and understanding body composition changes.
  • To address limitations and controversies in current body composition research.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of theoretical frameworks for multicomponent body composition models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of methodological considerations in model application and validation.
  • Discussion of statistical approaches pertinent to body composition data.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key theoretical, methodological, and statistical challenges in current multicomponent models.
    • Highlighted the potential of these models for validating new techniques and assessing body composition changes.
    • Emphasized the need for integrated study designs to overcome existing limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • Addressing the presented considerations can lead to improved multicomponent body composition models.
    • Future research should integrate theoretical, methodological, and statistical advancements for robust analysis.
    • Resolving controversies in FFB composition and validating new methodologies like DXA are achievable with improved approaches.