Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Non-Invasive Ultrasound Assessment of Endometrial Cancer Progression in Pax8-Directed Deletion of the Tumor Suppressors Arid1a and Pten in Mice
Published on: February 17, 2023
Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary
F J Hulsmans1, T L Tio, P Fockens
1Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Purpose:
To assess the depth of infiltration of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound (US) (TRUS) and analyze interpretation errors.
Materials And Methods:
Fifty-five consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent TRUS were prospectively studied. The effect of different patient inclusion criteria and US criteria was evaluated retrospectively.
Results:
Extensive overstaging of T2 tumors, partially caused by inflammatory (desmoplastic) reaction or retraction of the muscularis propria, resulted in a specificity of only 24% for detection of perirectal infiltration. Sensitivity was 97%, and accuracy was 64%. Considerable variation in staging accuracy was observed when different patient selection criteria were used. Variation of US criteria improved differentiation between T2 and T3 tumors only slightly.
Conclusion:
The effect of different US criteria on differentiation of T2 and T3 tumors is limited. Spontaneous or iatrogenic inflammation is a major limiting factor. The accuracy of TRUS in staging rectal cancer is affected by patient inclusion criteria.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

