Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Marginal modeling of binary cross-over data

M P Becker1, C C Balagtas

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.

Biometrics
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Test-retest reliability of the Upper Extremity Questionnaire among keyboard operators.

American journal of industrial medicine·2002
Same author

A multiple imputation strategy for incomplete longitudinal data.

Statistics in medicine·2001
Same author

Efficacy of inhaled human insulin in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomised proof-of-concept study.

Lancet (London, England)·2001
Same author

Inhaled human insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Annals of internal medicine·2001
Same author

Modeling contact networks and infection transmission in geographic and social space using GERMS.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2000
Same author

Reliability of physical examination of the upper extremity among keyboard operators.

American journal of industrial medicine·2000
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

A novel statistical model for binary cross-over trials improves analysis accuracy. This method, using linear models for log-odds ratios, offers a robust alternative for analyzing treatment effects in clinical studies.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Two-period binary cross-over experiments are common in clinical research.
  • Existing methods for analyzing such data may have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a new statistical model for analyzing two-period binary cross-over experiments.
  • To evaluate the performance of the proposed model against existing procedures.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed model utilizes linear models for marginal logits and log-odds ratios.
  • Standard likelihood methodology is employed for hypothesis testing and parameter estimation.
  • A simulation study was conducted to compare the model with established tests.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The proposed model provides a framework for analyzing binary cross-over data.
  • Simulation results indicate favorable comparisons with standard procedures like Mainland-Gart, Prescott's, and Hills-Armitage tests.
  • The model facilitates hypothesis testing and parameter estimation effectively.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed statistical model is a viable and effective approach for analyzing two-period binary cross-over experiments.
  • This method offers advantages in analyzing binary cross-over data compared to traditional statistical tests.