Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
Mobile cardiac catheterization: comparison with outpatient and inpatient catheterization at tertiary facilities
C M Elliott1, R M Bersin, A V Elliott
1Mobile Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Sanger Clinic, Charlotte, NC 28203.
Insights
Mobile cardiac catheterization is safe for low-risk patients, with a 0.7% complication rate. High-risk patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction require tertiary center care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Cardiac catheterization is a key diagnostic tool.
- Mobile catheterization labs offer expanded access to cardiac procedures.
- Assessing the safety and efficacy of mobile labs is crucial for patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and outcomes of cardiac catheterization performed in mobile units versus tertiary centers.
- To identify patient risk profiles suitable for mobile catheterization.
- To compare complication rates across different settings.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1,553 cardiac catheterizations across mobile units and tertiary hospitals.
- Categorization of procedures by setting: mobile unit, short-stay tertiary, and inpatient tertiary.
- Analysis of patient indications and complication rates based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) criteria.
Main Results:
- Mobile catheterizations (n=719) had a low complication rate (0.7%).
- Inpatient tertiary catheterizations (n=557) showed a higher complication rate (3.1%).
- Low-risk patients (atypical chest pain, positive stress tests) were suitable for mobile labs, while high-risk patients (unstable angina, myocardial infarction) required tertiary centers.
Conclusions:
- Mobile cardiac catheterization is a safe and effective option for carefully selected low-risk patients.
- A clear distinction in patient risk stratification is essential for determining the appropriate catheterization setting.
- Mobile catheterization labs can improve access to care while maintaining high safety standards.
Abstract:
The study group included 1,553 consecutive patients from areas serviced by our mobile catheterization laboratories: 719 procedures were performed in the mobile unit at their local hospitals, 277 were performed at a tertiary hospital with less than a 24 hr hospital stay, and 557 were performed at a tertiary hospital as inpatients. The indications for mobile catheterization were predominantly atypical chest pain, angina pectoris, or positive treadmill stress test, whereas patients with less than 24 hr hospitalization at the tertiary center had their catheterization performed for additional reasons. The majority of the inpatient indications were for recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) criteria for outpatient catheterization, the mobile catheterizations were performed safely with a complication rate of only 0.7% compared to a complication rate of 3.1% for inpatients demonstrating that a low risk group of patients can be prospectively identified and catheterized safely in the mobile setting. An extremely high risk group of patients with ongoing unstable angina and recent myocardial infarction was also identified which should undergo catheterization only at a tertiary center.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

