Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Combining graded categories: membership and typicality

J Huttenlocher1, L V Hedges

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637.

Psychological Review
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Traditional models fail to combine graded categories like "square tables." This study proposes a new model using joint distributions, improving how we understand category formation and typicality for graded concepts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication.

Psychological methods·2021
Same author

Common variant at 16p11.2 conferring risk of psychosis.

Molecular psychiatry·2012
Same author

Interventions to modify sexual risk behaviors for preventing HIV infection in men who have sex with men.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2003
Same author

Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2001
Same author

The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis.

Psychological methods·2001
Same author

Category effects on estimates of stimuli: perception or reconstruction?

Psychological science·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Formal Semantics
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Traditional category formation relies on set intersection, assuming precise category boundaries.
  • Many real-world categories are graded, exhibiting typicality effects and fuzzy boundaries.
  • Set intersection is inadequate for modeling the combination of these graded categories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the traditional set intersection model for combining graded categories.
  • To propose an alternative formal mechanism for constructing conjoint categories from graded constituents.
  • To account for both membership and typicality in conjoint categories.

Main Methods:

  • Critiquing the limitations of formal set intersection for graded categories.
  • Developing a novel formal mechanism based on joint distributions of values.
  • Analyzing the conditions under which the proposed model accurately represents conjoint categories.

Main Results:

  • Set intersection is inappropriate for combining graded categories due to their inexact boundaries and varying typicality.
  • A joint distribution model effectively constructs conjoint categories from graded constituents.
  • The proposed model successfully accounts for membership and typicality when constituent categories are independent or their relationship is known.

Conclusions:

  • The joint distribution model offers a more appropriate framework for understanding the formation of conjoint categories from graded constituents.
  • This approach enhances our understanding of how typicality and membership are represented in combined concepts.
  • Future research should explore the application of this model to various linguistic and cognitive phenomena.

Related Experiment Videos