Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning

R M Nosofsky1, T J Palmeri, S C McKinley

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405.

Psychological Review
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning to classify integral-dimension stimuli.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Dynamics of saccade target selection: race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque.

Vision research·2007
Same author

A single-system interpretation of dissociations between recognition and categorization in a task involving object-like stimuli.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2002
Same author

Learning categories at different hierarchical levels: a comparison of category learning models.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Category variability, exemplar similarity, and perceptual classification.

Memory & cognition·2002
Same author

Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

The rule-plus-exception (RULEX) model explains classification learning through simple rules and exceptions. It accounts for individual differences and various learning phenomena, predicting varied generalization patterns.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Machine Learning
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Classification learning is fundamental to cognition.
  • Existing models struggle to explain individual differences and specific learning phenomena.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Propose a novel rule-plus-exception (RULEX) model for classification learning.
  • Explain how humans learn categories using rules and exceptions.
  • Account for individual variability in classification tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the RULEX computational model.
  • Simulated classification learning processes.
  • Analyzed model predictions against empirical data.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • RULEX successfully explains prototype and exemplar effects.
  • The model accounts for sensitivity to correlational information and learning difficulty.
  • RULEX predicts individual differences in rule formation and exception storage.

Conclusions:

  • The rule-plus-exception model provides a parsimonious explanation for diverse classification phenomena.
  • RULEX highlights the importance of idiosyncratic rules and exceptions in human learning.
  • The model offers a framework for understanding individual variability in cognitive tasks.