Porcine aortic leaflet arrangement may contribute to clinical xenograft failure

Clinical experience with the first generation porcine xenograft shows significant deterioration and mechanical failure after 7-8 years post-implantation. Although many mechanisms of valve failure have been identified, the inherent differences between porcine and human aortic valves have not been emphasized. To determine if these differences are significant, the authors studied the anatomy of the aortic valve in 10 post-mortem porcine hearts. The authors found that the non-coronary leaflet was the smallest and the right leaflet was the largest based on the dimensions of area, perimeter, weight, and attached edge length (p < 0.05). These results differ from reported analyses of human aortic valves, in which the smallest cusp is generally the right the largest is the non-coronary. The authors believe that these differences between the human and porcine aortic valves may result in atypical mechanical stresses and the disruption of blood flow patterns in the sinuses of Valsalva, and may decrease the long-term stability of the porcine bioprostheses. In other words, the failure found with porcine bioprostheses after 8 years of implantation might be expected from the inherent structure (and associated fluid dynamics) of the porcine aortic valve positioned in the human aortic root.