Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does motion-induced grouping modulate the flanker compatibility effect?: A failure to replicate Driver & Baylis

G Berry1, R Klein

  • 1Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Motion-induced grouping did not significantly alter the flanker compatibility effect (FCE) distribution. Attention allocation in visual search is not robustly modulated by motion-based perceptual grouping.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current level of technology use, health and eHealth literacy in older Canadians with a recent fracture-a survey in orthopedic clinics.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020
Same author

Banff Lung Report: Current knowledge and future research perspectives for diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2018
Same author

Mesothelioma risk after 40 years since first exposure to asbestos: a pooled analysis.

Thorax·2014
Same author

Skeletal health in adult patients with classic galactosemia.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2012
Same author

Malignant mesotheliomas in former miners and millers of crocidolite at Wittenoom (Western Australia) after more than 50 years follow-up.

British journal of cancer·2012
Same author

Primary cervical tracheal monophasic synovial sarcoma confirmed by SYT-SSX gene rearrangement.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2011

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Attention Studies

Background:

  • The flanker compatibility effect (FCE) demonstrates how surrounding stimuli influence target identification.
  • Previous research suggests static visual properties like color and closure can guide attention and modulate FCE.
  • The role of motion-induced grouping in directing attention and affecting FCE remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether motion-induced perceptual grouping influences the spatial distribution of the flanker compatibility effect (FCE).
  • To determine if attention is directed to motion-defined groups, thereby modulating the FCE.
  • To compare the effects of motion-induced grouping with static grouping properties on attentional allocation.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants performed speeded identification of a central target letter within a five-letter string.
  • Stimuli involved compatible or incompatible flankers (near/far) and neutral letters.
  • Experimental conditions included all static letters and conditions where far distractors moved with the target while near distractors remained stationary.

    • Main Results:

    • Motion-induced grouping of far distractors with the target did not increase the FCE for these distractors compared to stationary near distractors.
    • Response latencies in the motion condition did not differ significantly from the all-static condition.
    • Accuracy was affected, but not in a way that supported attention being directed to motion-defined perceptual groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Modulation of attentional distribution by motion-induced grouping is not a robust phenomenon.
    • A simple spotlight model of attention is insufficient, as static grouping and stimulus motion demonstrably influence attention allocation and FCE.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the complex interplay between motion, grouping, and attention in visual search.