Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
The impact of exercise and intersubject variability on dose estimates for dichloromethane derived from a
1Risk Assessment Program, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226-1998.
Abstract:
Andersen et al. and Reitz et al. have developed physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for the human metabolism of methylene chloride (dichloromethane; DCM) and have advanced the hypothesis that the carcinogenicity of DCM is related to target organ metabolism of DCM by glutathione S-transferase (GST). The models included physiological parameters appropriate for humans at rest and metabolic parameters based on average rates of DCM metabolism. Increasing the model parameters describing cardiac output, alveolar ventilation, and blood flows to tissues from resting values to values consistent with light work conditions, and assuming a 25 ppm exposure for an 8-hr work day, increases the estimated GST-metabolized dose for human liver by a factor of 2.9 compared to the GST-metabolized does estimated of Reitz et al. These modifications also increase the GST-metabolized dose to the lung by 2.4-fold. If the model is also modified to reflect individual variation in DCM metabolism (in addition to the modifications for light work conditions), the estimated GST-metabolized dose for human liver ranges from 0 to as much as 5.4-fold greater than the dose estimated by Reitz et al. The GST-metabolized dose to the lung ranges from 0 to as much as 3.6-fold greater than the dose estimated by Reitz et al. These results indicate that some occupationally-exposed individuals may receive GST-metabolized doses several-fold greater than the Reitz et al. human dose estimates.
More Related Videos
10:33Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
07:26Conducting Maximal and Submaximal Endurance Exercise Testing to Measure Physiological and Biological Responses to Acute Exercise in Humans
Published on: October 17, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal assumptions,...
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This relationship...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.