Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fast spin echo STIR imaging

R C Smith1, R T Constable, C Reinhold

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiomics modelling in rectal cancer to predict disease-free survival: evaluation of different approaches.

The British journal of surgery·2021
Same author

Conditional risk of diverticulitis after non-operative management.

The British journal of surgery·2020
Same author

Performance comparison of modified ComBat for harmonization of radiomic features for multicenter studies.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

Impact of the T2-weighted axial oblique MRI sequence in the assessment of peroneal tendons.

Clinical radiology·2020
Same author

How to differentiate uterine leiomyosarcoma from leiomyoma with imaging.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2019
Same author

Ovarian cancer: An update on imaging in the era of radiomics.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2018
Same journal

Evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI With Diffusion and Clinicopathologic Features for Predicting Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence for Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis and Spine Fractures Using Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Accuracy and Variability of Spatial Localization of Infarct Core Predicted by CT Perfusion.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Acute Biliary Disorders and Complications.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Temporal Evolution of Sternal Healing on Chest CT Following Median Sternotomy: A Retrospective Analysis of Patterns of Fat Stranding, Lymphadenopathy, and Callus Formation.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

From Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics to the Prediction of Regional Nodal Metastasis in Laryngeal Cancer.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
See all related articles

Fast SE (FSE) STIR MRI offers a rapid alternative to conventional STIR imaging for musculoskeletal abnormalities. This technique provides comparable image quality and lesion detection, significantly reducing scan times.

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Musculoskeletal Radiology
  • Medical Imaging Techniques

Background:

  • Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) MRI is crucial for detecting musculoskeletal pathologies due to its optimal contrast.
  • Conventional SE (CSE) STIR sequences are limited by long imaging times and fewer obtainable sections.
  • Fast SE (FSE) techniques offer potential for accelerated MRI acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the image quality, contrast characteristics, and clinical utility of FSE STIR MRI.
  • To compare FSE STIR with conventional STIR for musculoskeletal imaging.

Main Methods:

  • Signal and contrast characteristics of FSE STIR were assessed using phantoms and volunteers.
  • Optimal FSE STIR parameters were determined.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conventional STIR and FSE STIR images were acquired in 14 patients and compared by radiologists for image quality and lesion detection.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant differences were found between FSE STIR and conventional STIR in lesion detection, image quality, motion artifact, or diagnostic accuracy.
    • FSE STIR images demonstrated comparable performance to conventional STIR.

    Conclusions:

    • FSE STIR imaging is a viable alternative to conventional STIR for musculoskeletal applications.
    • FSE STIR can be up to seven times faster than CSE STIR without compromising diagnostic efficacy.
    • This accelerated technique enhances the routine clinical utility of STIR MRI for musculoskeletal tumors and infections.