Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preferred frequency response for two- and three-channel amplification systems

D D Dirks1, J Ahlstrom, P D Noffsinger

  • 1Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Los Angeles, CA 90073.

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Two- and three-channel hearing aids showed no significant differences in preferred frequency-gain settings for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. Subject preferences varied across crossover frequencies, suggesting flexibility in hearing aid fitting.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of lexical factors on word recognition among normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
Same author

Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Ear and hearing·2001
Same author

Subjective judgements of clarity and intelligibility for filtered stimuli with equivalent speech intelligibility index predictions.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·1998
Same author

Subjective judgments of speech clarity measured by paired comparisons and category rating.

Ear and hearing·1997
Same author

Report of the Eriksholm Workshop on auditory deprivation and acclimatization.

Ear and hearing·1996
Same author

Comparison of probe insertion methods on estimates of ear canal SPL.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1996

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Hearing Science
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Hearing aid technology utilizes multi-channel amplification to optimize sound processing for individuals with hearing loss.
  • Understanding preferred frequency-gain responses is crucial for effective hearing aid fitting and patient satisfaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare preferred frequency-gain responses between two- and three-channel hearing amplification systems.
  • To investigate the influence of systematically varied crossover frequencies on these preferences.

Main Methods:

  • Nine participants with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss were tested.
  • A computer-controlled digital master hearing aid was used for real-time data acquisition.
  • Modified simplex and round-robin procedures were employed to determine preferred frequency-gain settings across different crossover frequencies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences were found between the preferred frequency-gain responses of two- and three-channel systems.
  • Preferred responses were not consistently linked to a single crossover frequency for all subjects.
  • Subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss showed a preference for a 1,120 Hz crossover frequency in the two-channel system.

Conclusions:

  • The number of channels (two vs. three) did not significantly impact preferred frequency-gain settings in linear amplification systems.
  • Subjective preferences for frequency-gain responses can be distributed across various crossover frequencies.
  • Physical similarities among preferred responses may influence preference judgments in hearing aid fitting.