Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mammography accreditation and equipment performance

G T Barnes1, R E Hendrick

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Hospitals and Clinics, Birmingham 35233.

Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Mammography accreditation ensures quality imaging and low radiation doses. Many facilities fail initial accreditation due to poor image quality and inadequate quality control, highlighting the need for rigorous audits.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improved spreading rates for monolayers applied as emulsions to reduce water evaporation.

Journal of colloid and interface science·2011
Same author

Preliminary studies in nutritional deficiencies.

The Journal of tropical medicine and hygiene·2010
Same author

Time-resolved grazing-incidence diffraction studies of thin films using an imaging-plate camera and focusing monochromator.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2006
Same author

The structure of ultrathin Langmuir-Blodgett films of cadmium behenate.

The Journal of chemical physics·2005
Same author

Focusing monochromator and imaging-plate camera for grazing-incidence diffraction studies of thin films.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2004
Same author

Relationship between phantom failure rates and radiation dose in mammography accreditation.

Medical physics·2002

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Mammography quality varies significantly across facilities, impacting diagnostic accuracy and patient safety.
  • Suboptimal imaging can result from issues with equipment, personnel, and quality control processes.
  • The American College of Radiology established a voluntary accreditation program to address these quality concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of the American College of Radiology's mammography accreditation program.
  • To identify common reasons for accreditation failure.
  • To assess the prevalence of equipment performance issues in mammography units.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from 11,162 mammography units seeking accreditation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of clinical and phantom image quality, and average glandular dose by medical physicists.
  • Review of quality control records and facility/equipment questionnaires.
  • Performance audit of 20 new mammography units.

    • Main Results:

    • Only 68% of units passed initial accreditation; an additional 18% passed after reapplication.
    • Inadequate clinical and phantom images were the primary reasons for failure.
    • Quality control records were also a significant factor in accreditation denial.
    • New units averaged 5.8 performance problems, many affecting image quality.

    Conclusions:

    • The mammography accreditation program identifies significant quality deficiencies.
    • Rigorous equipment performance audits are essential for ensuring optimal mammography.
    • Similar quality control issues may exist in other medical imaging modalities.