Related Experiment Videos
Median and ulnar nerve conduction studies: normative data for young adults
W J Hennessey1, F J Falco, R L Braddom
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
|March 1, 1994
Summary
This study establishes normative electrodiagnostic data for median and ulnar nerves, crucial for accurate interpretation of nerve conduction studies. Findings highlight age-related changes, particularly in sensory nerve action potential amplitude.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Clinical Electrophysiology
Background:
- Accurate interpretation of electrodiagnostic studies requires standardized techniques and normative data.
- Factors like temperature, age, and physical characteristics influence nerve conduction parameters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide comprehensive normative electrodiagnostic data for the median and ulnar nerves.
- To assess the impact of age, sex, sidedness, and handedness on nerve conduction parameters.
Main Methods:
- Nerve conduction studies were performed on 44 healthy subjects.
- Data collected included motor and sensory distal latencies and amplitudes for median and ulnar nerves.
- Statistical analysis considered age, sex, height, finger circumference, and instrumentation.
Main Results:
- Established normative values for median and ulnar nerve motor and sensory studies.
- Median nerve: motor DL 3.2 msec, DAMP 12.1 mV; sensory DL 2.5 msec, DAMP 31.4 microV (men) / 52.4 microV (women).
- Ulnar nerve: motor DL 2.6 msec, DAMP 12.6 mV; sensory DL 2.4 msec, DAMP 27.0 microV (men) / 52.9 microV (women).
- Aging showed minimal effects, more pronounced in median nerve sensory amplitudes.
- Sidedness and handedness did not significantly impact parameters.
Conclusions:
- The study provides essential normative data for median and ulnar nerves, vital for clinical electrodiagnosis.
- Age is a factor influencing nerve conduction, particularly sensory nerve action potential amplitude.
- Standardized methods and consideration of influencing factors are critical for reliable electrodiagnostic interpretations.