Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2026
Electrochemiluminescence Assays for Human Islet Autoantibodies
Published on: March 23, 2018
Solid versus liquid phase assays in detection of insulin antibodies. Influence of iodination site on labelled insulin
R R Stumpo1, A S Llera, A I Cardoso
1Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Department of Immunology, Argentina.
On type 1 newly diagnosed and on insulin treated diabetic patients, anti-insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and antibodies (IA) having the same specificity are respectively induced. Such immune response may be evaluated either by radiobinding assay (RBA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Both methodologies have been compared at previous International Workshops, which pointed out discrepancies in results. In this work, IAA/IA prevalence was assessed by displacement RBA and ELISA, in normal subjects, type 2 (treated with hypoglycaemic agents), insulin treated and newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. Results showed a lack of RBA-ELISA agreement. An attempt was then made to determine whether such results were, at least in part, attributable to iodination site in Tyr-A14. For this purpose parallel RBA assays were carried out by using radiolabelled insulin at A14 and A19 Tyr residues. Control sera and samples from insulin treated and type 1 newly diagnosed diabetic patients were tested. Our results suggest that labelling position is not involved in artifactual binding of tracers, at least as a systematic phenomenon. In the majority of cases the variability in RBA-ELISA signal ratios are best explained in terms of differences in the basic principles operating in both methods instead of artifacts due to tracer preparation.
On type 1 newly diagnosed and on insulin treated diabetic patients, anti-insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and antibodies (IA) having the same specificity are respectively induced. Such immune response may be evaluated either by radiobinding assay (RBA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Both methodologies have been compared at previous International Workshops, which pointed out discrepancies in results. In this work, IAA/IA prevalence was assessed by displacement RBA and ELISA, in normal subjects, type 2 (treated with hypoglycaemic agents), insulin treated and newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. Results showed a lack of RBA-ELISA agreement. An attempt was then made to determine whether such results were, at least in part, attributable to iodination site in Tyr-A14. For this purpose parallel RBA assays were carried out by using radiolabelled insulin at A14 and A19 Tyr residues. Control sera and samples from insulin treated and type 1 newly diagnosed diabetic patients were tested. Our results suggest that labelling position is not involved in artifactual binding of tracers, at least as a systematic phenomenon. In the majority of cases the variability in RBA-ELISA signal ratios are best explained in terms of differences in the basic principles operating in both methods instead of artifacts due to tracer preparation.
Related Concept Videos
01:33Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
There are many different types of ELISAs, but they all involve an antibody molecule whose constant region binds an enzyme, leaving the variable region free to bind its specific antigen. Enzyme-substrate reaction allows the antigen to be visualized or quantified.
01:30Production of Pharmaceuticals