Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Bone density measurements and their indications]

M A Dambacher1, P Rüegsegger

  • 1Orthopdische Universitäts-Klinik Balgrist, Zürich.

Der Orthopade
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early detection of osteoarthritis by 3D computed tomography.

Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine·2014
Same author

Multicentre European COMAC-BME study on the standardisation of bone densitometry procedures.

Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine·2014
Same author

[Combination of alendronate plus alfacalcidol in the treatment of osteoporosis. Rationale, preclinical data and clinical evidence].

MMW Fortschritte der Medizin·2013
Same author

Long-term changes in the tibia and radius bone mineral density following spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord·2004
Same author

Image-based micro-finite-element modeling for improved distal radius strength diagnosis: moving from bench to bedside.

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry·2004
Same author

Mechanical consequences of different scenarios for simulated bone atrophy and recovery in the distal radius.

Bone·2003
Same journal

[Fast-track hip and knee joint arthroplasty].

Der Orthopade·2022
Same journal

[Outpatient care through cross-sector prehabilitation and rehabilitation concepts in outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty].

Der Orthopade·2022
Same journal

[Preoperative management in fast-track arthroplasty].

Der Orthopade·2022
Same journal

[Perioperative management in fast-track arthroplasty].

Der Orthopade·2022
Same journal

[Pain therapy and anaesthesiological procedures in fast-track arthroplasty].

Der Orthopade·2022
Same journal

[Discharge readiness versus discharge-Results of the PROMISE study].

Der Orthopade·2022
See all related articles

Accurate bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using quantitative computed tomography (qCT) helps tailor osteoporosis treatment. Differentiating bone types allows personalized therapies, improving patient outcomes and compliance.

Area of Science:

  • Bone Densitometry
  • Osteoporosis Diagnosis
  • Medical Imaging Techniques

Context:

  • Dual-photon absorptiometry with X-rays (DEXA) and quantitative computed tomography (qCT) are primary methods for measuring bone mineral density (BMD).
  • qCT offers an advantage by distinguishing between trabecular and cortical bone, which do not change in parallel, informing treatment decisions.
  • Peripheral qCT (Densiscan) demonstrates high reproducibility (0.3%), enabling detection of less than 1% change in BMD.

Purpose:

  • To compare bone mineral density measurement techniques, specifically DEXA and qCT.
  • To highlight the clinical utility of qCT in differentiating bone types for targeted osteoporosis management.
  • To emphasize the importance of accurate BMD measurement for personalized treatment strategies.

Summary:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Quantitative computed tomography (qCT) allows differentiation of trabecular and cortical bone, crucial for tailoring osteoporosis treatment.
  • High reproducibility of peripheral qCT (0.3%) enables early detection of bone density changes.
  • Personalized treatment based on bone loss rate ('slow loser' vs. 'fast loser') improves patient compliance and reduces non-responders.

Impact:

  • Enables "tailored" treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal patients.
  • Improves patient compliance by providing data-driven treatment choices.
  • Reduces the number of non-responders to osteoporosis therapies through precise patient stratification.