Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The historical method in psychiatric research

J Davies1

  • 1Adult Mental Health Service, Woodridge, Queensland.

The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Psychiatric research uses historical methods, comparable in rigor to natural science. Both approaches are vital for comprehensive case formulation, avoiding common evidence and inference errors.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In situ observation of streptavidin-biotin binding on an immunoassay well surface using an atomic force microscope.

FEBS letters·1996
Same author

Inhibition of the self-cleavage reaction of the human hepatitis delta virus ribozyme by antibiotics.

Journal of molecular biology·1996
Same author

A prospective study of self-esteem in the prediction of eating problems in adolescent schoolgirls: questionnaire findings.

The British journal of clinical psychology·1996
Same author

Distribution of thiols in microorganisms: mycothiol is a major thiol in most actinomycetes.

Journal of bacteriology·1996
Same author

Epidemiology of adult Still's disease.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·1996
Same author

Severe small airways disease resistant to medical treatment in a child with cystic fibrosis.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·1996

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Philosophy of Science

Background:

  • Historical methods are foundational in psychiatric research.
  • Natural science methodologies offer a comparative framework for evaluating research rigor.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the historical method in psychiatric research with natural science methods.
  • To identify and illustrate methodological errors in psychiatric research.
  • To assert the necessity of both historical and natural science approaches in psychiatry.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of research methodologies.
  • Examination of case examples to identify errors in evidence gathering and inference.
  • Literature review of psychiatric and natural science research practices.

Main Results:

  • Methodological errors, particularly in evidence collection and inference, are prevalent in historical psychiatric research.
  • The historical method, when rigorously applied, can achieve a level of scientific precision comparable to natural science.
  • Both historical and natural science methods are indispensable for a complete psychiatric case formulation.

Conclusions:

  • The historical method is a valid and rigorous approach in psychiatric research.
  • Ensuring rigor in evidence gathering and inference is crucial for reliable psychiatric research.
  • A synthesis of historical and natural science methods enhances the comprehensive understanding of psychiatric cases.

Related Experiment Videos