Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Attention/likelihood theory: reply to Hintzman (1994)

K Kim¹, M Glanzer

¹Department of Psychology, New York University, New York 10003.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition

|January 1, 1994

Summary

This study rebuts criticisms of attention/likelihood theory in recognition memory. We address and refute claims about an incorrect equation and an alternative transformation for likelihood ratios.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effects of small dose of brotizolam on P300.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2001

Same author

Melatonin treatment for circadian rhythm sleep disorders.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2001

Same author

An overview of group sequential methods in longitudinal clinical trials.

Statistical methods in medical research·2001

Same author

Determination of floral fragrances of Rosa hybrida using solid-phase trapping-solvent extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Journal of chromatography. A·2001

Same author

Effects of background noise on audiometric thresholds during positron emission tomography: passive and active noise-reduction.

Scandinavian audiology·2001

Same author

Evidence for direct involvement of beta-catenin in phorbol ester-induced neurite outgrowth in GT1-1 hypothalamic neurones.

Journal of neuroendocrinology·2001

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Psychology

Background:

D. L. Hintzman (1994) presented criticisms of the attention/likelihood theory of recognition memory.
The criticisms focused on two main points: an incorrect equation and the potential for an alternative transformation of likelihood ratios.

Purpose of the Study:

To address and rebut D. L. Hintzman's specific criticisms of the attention/likelihood theory.
To clarify the accuracy of the theory's mathematical formulation and the utility of its likelihood ratios.

Main Methods:

Detailed examination of the attention/likelihood theory's equations.
Analysis and comparison of likelihood ratio transformations.

Main Results:

The criticism regarding the incorrect equation for attention/likelihood theory was rebutted.
The proposed alternative transformation for likelihood ratios was shown to be less preferable than the original.

Conclusions:

The attention/likelihood theory remains robust against the presented criticisms.
The original formulation and likelihood ratios of the theory are defended and validated.

Related Experiment Videos