Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sharing verbal and visuospatial resources in working memory

D H Holding1

  • 1University of Louisville, Kentucky.

The Journal of General Psychology
|July 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

This study tested working memory resource capacity. Inserting a motor task into verbal memory retention disrupted both tasks, suggesting component processes, not just resource limits, explain working memory interference.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensory storage reconsidered.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

A rejoinder.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Risk versus effort in the assessment of motor fatigue.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Risk and effort measures of fatigue.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

The effects of noise and speech on cognitive task performance.

The Journal of general psychology·1993
Same author

Limitations of the cognitive vigilance increment.

Human factors·1987

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Resource capacity theories propose limits on cognitive processing.
  • Working memory is crucial for complex cognitive tasks.
  • Understanding task interference informs cognitive architecture models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate working memory resource capacity using dual-task paradigms.
  • To test predictions of single-resource and multiple-resource models.
  • To examine interference patterns between verbal memory and visual-motor tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a digit memory task (verbal) and a delayed visual aiming task (visual-motor).
  • Tasks were performed singly or in dual-task conditions with varying retention intervals.
  • Assessed asymmetrical interference when one task was embedded within the other's retention period.

Main Results:

  • Task delay alone did not affect retention.
  • Inserting the visual-motor task into verbal memory retention caused significant interference in both tasks.
  • Inserting verbal memory into the visual-motor delay showed minimal interference.

Conclusions:

  • Findings do not support simple single or multiple resource capacity models.
  • Results are better explained by considering distinct component processes within working memory.
  • Task interference patterns highlight the specialized nature of working memory components.

Related Experiment Videos