Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring utility values for QALYs: two methodological issues

R Smith1, M Dobson

  • 1Department of Community Medicine, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.

Health Economics
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for Light Pseudoscalar Bosons, Pair-Produced in Higgs Boson Decays in the Four-Electron Final State in Proton-Proton Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Evidence for Mixing-Induced CP Violation in B_{s}^{0}→J/ψϕ(1020) Decays in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Observation of Suppressed Charged-Particle Production in Ultrarelativistic Oxygen-Oxygen Collisions.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Measurement of D^{0} Meson Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Heavy Ion Collisions.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Observation of tWZ Production at the CMS Experiment.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Exclusive Reconstruction of the B^{*+}, B^{*0}, and B_{s}^{*0} Mesons and Precise Measurement of Their Masses.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Lead in Drinking Water and Child Health: Evidence From Jackson, Mississippi.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Health on the Move: The Impact of Poverty Alleviation Relocation on Healthcare Utilization in China.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Compulsory Licensing: A Case Study of HIV Drugs.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Beyond Tobacco Prevention: The Effects of Tobacco 21 Laws on Young Adults' Body Weight.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Assessing the Estimands and Estimates of Hospitalization Rates in Health Economics and Clinical Medicine.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Unemployment Insurance Benefit Cuts on Mental Health: Evidence From Early Pandemic Program Expirations.

Health economics·2026
See all related articles

Utility estimation in cost-utility analyses (CUA) faces bias from health state descriptions and anchor point interpretation. Addressing these methodological concerns is crucial for consistent utility measurement techniques in CUA.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Decision Analysis
  • Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a key tool for healthcare decision-making.
  • Accurate utility estimation is fundamental to valid CUA results.
  • Current methods for utility estimation present methodological challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine two key methodological concerns in utility estimation within disease-specific CUAs.
  • To identify how health state description generation and anchor point interpretation can bias CUA findings.
  • To propose recommendations for improving consistency in utility measurement.

Main Methods:

  • Review of utility estimation methodologies in cost-utility analyses.
  • Critical examination of health state description (scenario) development.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the interpretation and use of interval scale anchor points.

    • Main Results:

    • Utility estimation in CUA can be fundamentally biased by the generation of information in health state scenarios.
    • The researcher's definition of anchor points significantly impacts the interpretation of interval scales.
    • Inconsistent application of utility measurement techniques is prevalent.

    Conclusions:

    • Explicit reporting of methods for health state descriptions and anchor point interpretation is recommended for CUAs.
    • Standardizing these reporting practices will enhance the consistency and validity of utility measurement.
    • Addressing these methodological issues is vital for reliable healthcare economic evaluations.