Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

[Paradoxical interventions: explanation and categorization]

H J Kern1

  • 1Universität Oldenburg, Fachbereich 1, Erziehungswissenschaftliches Institut II.

Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Evaluation of paradoxical interventions].

Zeitschrift fur klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie und Psychotherapie·1993
Same author

The effects of fading, feedback, and feedback plus instruction on the performance of institutionalized retarded children in number retention exercise.

Psychologische Forschung·1972
Same author

[Molecular structure changes in chemical reactions. XXI. Deamination in the bicyclo (2,2,1)-heptane series].

Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie·1969
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Paradoxical interventions are crucial in systemic family therapy for treating numerous symptoms. Tailoring these interventions to client characteristics like reactance may enhance therapeutic effects and efficacy.

Area of Science:

  • Psychotherapy
  • Systemic Family Therapy
  • Clinical Psychology

Context:

  • Paradoxical interventions are widely utilized in systemic family therapy.
  • Over 40 symptoms are treated using these therapeutic techniques.
  • The need for clear explanations and categorizations of paradoxical interventions is evident.

Purpose:

  • To explore the utility of explanations and categorizations for paradoxical interventions.
  • To investigate how client characteristics (e.g., reactance, perceived freedom) influence therapeutic outcomes.
  • To determine if paradoxical interventions can be integrated into broader psychotherapy frameworks.

Summary:

  • This study highlights the importance of paradoxical interventions in systemic family therapy.
  • It suggests that understanding client-specific factors, such as reactance, can optimize the efficacy of these interventions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The concept of decontextualization is proposed as a means to integrate paradoxical techniques into mainstream psychotherapy.

    • Impact:

    • Provides a framework for categorizing and explaining paradoxical interventions.
    • Suggests potential for improved therapeutic outcomes through tailored intervention strategies.
    • Facilitates discussion on the broader integration of paradoxical techniques in psychotherapy.