Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Similarity and property effects in inductive reasoning

E Heit1, J Rubinstein

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Inductive reasoning about animal properties relies on specific similarity measures. Anatomical and behavioral properties are best predicted by corresponding similarity types, not a single measure.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Geophysics. Coping with earthquakes induced by fluid injection.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2015
Same author

A mathematical model for the progression of dental caries.

Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA·2013
Same author

Bifurcation diagram and pattern formation of phase slip centers in superconducting wires driven with electric currents.

Physical review letters·2007
Same author

Evaluation of different choices of n in an n of m processor for cochlear implants.

Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·2002
Same author

Two theorems in catoptrics.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2002
Same author

Diversity-based reasoning in children.

Cognitive psychology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Animal Cognition
  • Inductive Reasoning

Background:

  • Inductive inferences are crucial for generalizing knowledge.
  • The role of similarity in inductive reasoning has been extensively studied.
  • Previous models often assumed a single, general measure of similarity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether different types of properties rely on distinct similarity measures for inductive inference.
  • To test the hypothesis that property-specific similarity influences inductive strength.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using animal categories.
  • Participants judged the probability of property inheritance between categories.
  • Similarity ratings for anatomical and behavioral features were collected and analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Inductive inferences were strongest when the property type matched the similarity type (e.g., anatomical similarity for anatomical properties).
  • Results indicate that a single similarity measure cannot explain all inductive inferences.
  • Both anatomical and behavioral similarity influenced behavioral inferences, while only anatomical similarity influenced anatomical inferences.

Conclusions:

  • Inductive reasoning is sensitive to the specific nature of both the properties and the similarities involved.
  • Distinct similarity dimensions (anatomical, behavioral) play differential roles in inductive generalization.
  • These findings challenge models relying on a unitary measure of similarity for inductive reasoning.

Related Experiment Videos