Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing prevention effectiveness using data to drive program decisions

S B Thacker1, J P Koplan, W R Taylor

  • 1Public Health Service's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30341-3724.

Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Financing immunization of adults in the United States.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2007
Same author

WITHDRAWN: Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2007
Same author

Prevention of knee injuries in sports. A systematic review of the literature.

The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness·2003
Same author

Motor-vehicle occupant injury: strategies for increasing use of child safety seats, increasing use of safety belts, and reducing alcohol-impaired driving.

MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports·2002
Same author

The meaning and value of prevention research.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2002
Same author

Health care data and health: from numbers to outcomes.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2002
Same journal

Experiential and Structural Determinants of Communicable Disease Reporting Among Health Care Providers in Alameda County, California.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same journal

A Case-Case Study of Sporadic and Outbreak-Associated Listeriosis Exposures: <i>Listeria</i> Initiative Food History Data, 2016-2022.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same journal

Developing a Prioritization Method for Imported Infectious Diseases Using National Notifiable Surveillance Data: The Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games Experience.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same journal

Reduction in Hepatitis C Virus RNA Positivity Among Clients in an Inpatient Substance Use Treatment Program in New York City.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same journal

Managing Institutional Change Through Participatory Planning: Creating the College of Integrated Health Sciences at the University at Albany, State University of New York.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
Same journal

An Urgent Need for Evidence-Based Guidance on Mercury Exposure Screening to Inform Public Health Policy, Practice, and Prevention.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating health promotion and disease prevention effectiveness requires analyzing health outcomes and impacts. Rigorous assessment ensures public health interventions are accepted and funded.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Effectiveness of health promotion and disease prevention is measured by impact on public health and clinical medicine.
  • Assessment involves quantitative analysis of health outcomes and evaluation of medical, legal, ethical, and economic impacts of prevention activities.
  • Key criteria include efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, prioritizing health improvement over cost containment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline methods for assessing the effectiveness of health promotion and disease prevention activities.
  • To demonstrate the application of these methods using case studies.
  • To emphasize the importance of rigorous evaluation for the acceptance and funding of preventive interventions.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Quantitative analysis of health outcomes.
  • Evaluation of medical, legal, ethical, and economic impacts.
  • Case study analysis of specific prevention programs (e.g., measles, breast cancer, diabetic retinopathy).

    • Main Results:

    • Prevention effectiveness assessment requires a multi-faceted approach considering various impacts.
    • Case studies illustrate diverse evaluation strategies for different public health issues.
    • Improved health outcomes at a reasonable cost are the primary goal.

    Conclusions:

    • Rigorous evaluation is crucial for the widespread adoption and financial support of preventive health measures.
    • Assessment results inform policy decisions and priority setting in public health.
    • Effective prevention strategies ultimately aim to improve population health and well-being.