Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[New intervention procedures: lasers, atherectomy, stents]

A Schömig1, M Seyfarth, A Kastrati

  • 1I. Medizinische Klinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar.

Zeitschrift Fur Kardiologie
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon vs. second-generation drug-eluting stent for coronary in-stent restenosis.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2025
Same author

Stem Cell Therapy after Acute Myocardial Infarction-The Emperor's New Clothes?: Stem Cell Mobilization by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 295: 1003-1010, 2006.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN·2023
Same author

Integrin ß1 polymorphisms and bleeding risk after coronary artery stenting.

Molecular biology reports·2019
Same author

A comparison of gamma-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase as prognostic markers in patients with coronary heart disease.

Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD·2017
Same author

Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable stents in routine clinical practice: Results of the ISAR-ABSORB registry.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2015
Same author

Significant aortic regurgitation after transfemoral aortic valve implantation: patients' gender as independent risk factor.

Minerva cardioangiologica·2015

New coronary devices like atherectomy, laser angioplasty, and stents offer specific advantages over conventional balloon angioplasty (PTCA) for complex lesions. Optimal device selection is key to achieving the best post-procedure results and minimizing restenosis.

Area of Science:

  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Devices
  • Vascular Surgery

Context:

  • Conventional balloon angioplasty (PTCA) has limitations in treating complex coronary artery disease.
  • Newer coronary devices, including atherectomy, laser angioplasty, and stents, have been developed to address these limitations.
  • The comparative efficacy and indications for these novel devices require careful evaluation.

Purpose:

  • To compare the acute complications and late outcomes of new coronary devices versus conventional PTCA.
  • To identify specific indications where novel coronary devices demonstrate superior results.
  • To evaluate the impact of intervention type on restenosis rates.

Summary:

  • No single new coronary device has shown general superiority over PTCA regarding acute complications.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Late outcomes and restenosis are primarily determined by the initial success in achieving a wide post-procedure lumen diameter, not the device type.
  • Specific indications, such as venous bypass grafts, aorto-ostial lesions, and complex calcified lesions, benefit from atherectomy, laser angioplasty, and stents, offering better acute results than PTCA.

    • Impact:

    • The selection of the appropriate device for specific lesion types or acute complications is crucial for optimizing procedural success.
    • Achieving the best possible post-procedural lumen diameter is paramount in minimizing the risk of restenosis.
    • These findings guide clinicians in choosing the most effective intervention for complex coronary interventions.