Related Experiment Videos
Acoustic reflex threshold tenth percentiles and functional hearing impairment
1Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, Queens College of CUNY, Flushing 11367.
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|January 1, 1994
Summary
Tonal acoustic reflex thresholds (ARTs) effectively identify functional hearing loss when thresholds exceed 60 dB HL. However, ARTs are less reliable for detecting functional components at or below 55 dB HL.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Hearing Science
- Otoacoustic Emissions
Background:
- Functional hearing impairments, often termed non-organic hearing loss, present diagnostic challenges.
- Objective audiological measures are crucial for confirming subjective hearing complaints.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of tonal acoustic reflex thresholds (ARTs) in identifying and confirming functional hearing impairments.
- To compare ARTs in ears with functional impairments against normative data.
Main Methods:
- Tonal ARTs were measured in 74 ears with reported functional impairments.
- ARTs were compared to the 10th percentiles of established ARTs for normal and cochlear-impaired ears (500-2000 Hz).
- A control group of 50 ears with sensorineural hearing loss was used to assess the false positive rate.
Main Results:
- ARTs correctly identified functional losses in 70.9% to 85.7% of ears with voluntary thresholds ≥ 60 dB HL.
- Only 5.3% of ears with voluntary thresholds ≤ 55 dB HL were correctly identified.
- The false positive rate in the control group was low, ranging from 5% to 7%.
Conclusions:
- Tonal ARTs serve as an effective nonbehavioral tool for identifying functional hearing loss when thresholds are ≥ 60 dB HL.
- ARTs are not reliable for detecting functional hearing loss components when thresholds are ≤ 55 dB HL.
- ARTs can help substantiate the presence of functional hearing impairments in specific audiological ranges.