Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models

M Bullinger1, R Anderson, D Cella

  • 1Institute for Medical Psychology, University of Munich, Germany.

Quality of Life Research : an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coefficients of Repeatability for Likely Change: Comparison between PROMIS Computer Adaptive Tests and Short Forms.

Advances in patient-reported outcomes·2026
Same author

Crosswalk between PROMIS computer adaptive tests and numerical rating scales in cancer patients: Anxiety, depression, pain interference, physical function.

Advances in patient-reported outcomes·2026
Same author

Development of the novel nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease symptoms scale (NTM-SS).

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

United Kingdom value set for the functional assessment of cancer therapy eight dimension (FACT-8D) preference-based quality of life instrument.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2025
Same author

Health-related quality-of-life profile and clinical outcomes in first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma: a modeling analysis based on the CheckMate 9ER study.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

Derivation of a simple risk calculator for predicting clinical worsening in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease.

JHLT open·2025

Developing cross-culturally valid health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments is crucial for international medical research. This paper reviews methods for creating and evaluating international HRQL measures to ensure accurate cross-cultural comparisons.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Health outcomes assessment
  • Cross-cultural research

Background:

  • International medical research collaboration necessitates culturally sensitive health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessment tools.
  • Cultural variations in defining HRQL, observational levels, and the importance of HRQL dimensions can introduce bias.
  • Existing literature lacks comprehensive guidelines for developing and evaluating international HRQL measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review major approaches for developing international HRQL measures.
  • To discuss methods and criteria for evaluating measurement equivalence across cultures.
  • To summarize recent trends in international HRQL assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing approaches to international HRQL measure development.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of recommended methods for evaluating measurement equivalence.
  • Synthesis of recent advancements in the field.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified theoretical bases for cultural bias in HRQL measurement.
    • Highlighted the lack of standardized procedures for international HRQL development and evaluation.
    • Presented a review of current approaches and evaluation criteria.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized procedures are needed for developing and evaluating international HRQL measures.
    • Ensuring measurement equivalence is vital for valid cross-cultural comparisons in clinical trials.
    • Continued advancements are essential for robust international HRQL assessment.