Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures

R M Kaplan1, D Feeny, D A Revicki

  • 1Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0622.

Quality of Life Research : an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A novel neurotropic microsporidium from the swamp guppy Micropoecilia picta from Grenada, West Indies.

Diseases of aquatic organisms·2024
Same author

United States Value Set for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Eight Dimensions (FACT-8D), a Cancer-Specific Preference-Based Quality of Life Instrument.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2023
Same author

Physician deaths from COVID-19 have been lower than expected.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2021
Same author

Importation of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins on a US thoroughbred farm.

International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance·2020
Same author

Equine parasite control and the role of national legislation - A multinational questionnaire survey.

Veterinary parasitology·2018
Same author

The content validity of the PSS in patients with plaque psoriasis.

Journal of patient-reported outcomes·2018
Same journal

Comparative performance of EQ-5D-5L bolt-ons in China and the Netherlands: results from the EQ-DAPHNIE project.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Content validity, face validity and comprehensiveness of generic quality-of-life measures in adults and children with rare genetic conditions and their carers: a think aloud qualitative study.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Explaining inequalities in quality of life: a longitudinal study of health disparities in Norway.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Eligibility definitions and response rate accuracy in studies using routinely collected PROMs: a systematic review.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Designing oncology-specific patient-reported outcome dashboards: end-user preferences for reference curve inclusion and visualization in pediatric cancer care.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Concerns about "a direct comparison of the measurement properties of the PROMIS-16 and EQ-5D-5L in the U.S. general population".

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
See all related articles

This review examines preference assessment methods for health-related quality of life measures, like the quality-adjusted life year (QALY). It highlights differing economic and psychological approaches, suggesting simple rating scales may better reflect true preferences.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of Life Research

Background:

  • Cost-utility analyses rely on standardized health outcome measures, such as the quality-adjusted life year (QALY).
  • QALY methodology incorporates preference measures to quantify subjective health status.
  • Discrepancies exist between economists' and psychologists' preferred methods for assessing these preferences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare economic and psychological approaches to preference assessment in health-related quality of life.
  • To evaluate the validity and assumptions of various utility measurement techniques.
  • To explore the implications for cost-utility studies and QALY calculations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of economic preference assessment methods (standard gamble, time-trade off, person trade-off).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of psychological research on decision-making under risk and information processing.
  • Analysis of evidence supporting alternative methods, such as rating scales.
  • Consideration of integrated cognitive and economic models in recent research.

    • Main Results:

    • Economic methods assume rational decision-making and accurate integration of complex probabilities, which may be challenged by cognitive limitations.
    • Psychological evidence suggests economic methods may not fully capture underlying preferences, with rating scales showing promise.
    • Differences in preferences across social groups appear to be minimal.

    Conclusions:

    • The validity of economic preference assessment methods is debated due to cognitive constraints in decision-making.
    • Simple rating scales may offer a more robust alternative for measuring subjective health preferences.
    • Ongoing research integrates cognitive and economic models to refine preference measurement in health economics.