Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rotational path partial denture design: a 10-year clinical follow-up--Part I

T E Jacobson1

  • 1Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensitivity after amalgam.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·1994
Same author

Rotational path partial denture design: a 10-year clinical follow-up--Part II.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·1994
Same author

The significance of adhesive denture base resin.

The International journal of prosthodontics·1989
Same author

Bond strength of 4-META acrylic resin denture base to cobalt chromium alloy.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·1988
Same author

Periodontal considerations in removable partial denture design.

Compendium (Newtown, Pa.)·1987
Same author

Removable partial dentures with rotational paths of insertion: problem analysis.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·1983

Rotational path placement for removable partial dentures allows sequential framework seating, often reducing clasps. This improves biomechanical properties, esthetics, and patient acceptance.

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Conventional removable partial dentures (RPDs) require simultaneous placement of all components.
  • This can complicate the fabrication and insertion process.
  • Simultaneous seating may necessitate more clasps, potentially impacting esthetics and patient comfort.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the advantages of alternative placement paths for RPD frameworks.
  • To investigate how dual, curved, or rotational paths affect prosthesis design and function.
  • To determine if these paths can enhance biomechanical properties and patient acceptance.

Main Methods:

  • Review of biomechanical principles related to RPD framework design.
  • Analysis of placement path variations (straight vs. dual/curved/rotational).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of clasp reduction and its impact on prosthesis stability and esthetics.

    • Main Results:

    • Dual, curved, or rotational paths allow for sequential seating of RPD framework components.
    • This approach often permits a reduction in the number of clasps required.
    • Eliminating clasps can decrease tooth coverage and improve the overall esthetics of the prosthesis.

    Conclusions:

    • Rotational path designs offer a viable alternative to conventional straight-path RPDs.
    • These designs can maintain or improve biomechanical function while enhancing esthetics.
    • Improved esthetics and reduced clasp usage contribute to better patient acceptance of removable partial dentures.