Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial S-R compatibility: positional instruction vs. compatibility instruction

G Heister1, P Schroeder-Heister

  • 1Universität Tübingen, Abteilung Klinische und Physiologische Psychologie, Germany.

Acta Psychologica
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial S-R compatibility with orthogonal stimulus-response relationship.

Perception & psychophysics·1989
Same author

Shift of functional cerebral asymmetry during the menstrual cycle.

Neuropsychologia·1989
Same author

Spatial S-R compatibility under head tilt.

Acta psychologica·1988
Same author

Evidence for stimulus-response compatibility effects in a divided visual field study of cerebral lateralization.

Acta psychologica·1987
Same author

Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: effects of irrelevant stimulus location.

Perception & psychophysics·1987
Same author

Spatial S-R compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions.

Perception & psychophysics·1986
Same journal

MRI correlates of emotion recognition in vascular dementia: An empty systematic review.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

The core symptoms of elementary school students' fear of negative evaluation and its network relationship with self-confidence and family atmosphere.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Examining the moderating role of psychological hardiness in the relation between job demands and teachers' emotional exhaustion.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Counter-Empathy Scale: Adapting and developing psychometric properties in Northeast India.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

When AI creates: Creative self-efficacy as a mediator in design professionals' adoption of AI image generators.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Effects of multimodal feedback on L2 English learners' lexical stress error correction: The role of learning style and feedback preference.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

Spatial compatibility effects, crucial for understanding stimulus-response mapping, were observed in positional instructions but vanished with compatibility instructions. This supports translation over automatic activation theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Spatial stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) describes the phenomenon where response performance is influenced by the spatial relationship between stimuli and response locations.
  • Two main hypotheses, the automatic activation hypothesis and the translation hypothesis, attempt to explain the underlying mechanisms of SRC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of different instruction types on spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
  • To differentiate between the automatic activation and translation hypotheses of SRC.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a spatial compatibility task under two conditions: positional instruction (response based on stimulus location) and compatibility instruction (response based on stimulus color, determining compatibility).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Response times and accuracy were measured for both compatible and incompatible trials in each condition.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant advantage for compatible over incompatible responses was found under the positional instruction condition.
    • The spatial compatibility effect disappeared entirely under the compatibility instruction condition, with no difference between compatible and incompatible responses.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support the translation hypothesis, suggesting that spatial compatibility arises from a translation process between stimulus and response representations.
    • The results argue against the automatic activation hypothesis, which posits that spatial compatibility automatically activates response pathways.