Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic colectomy: at what cost?

D J Musser1, R C Boorse, F Madera

  • 1Department of Surgery, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, PA.

Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2011
Same author

Factors influencing postoperative adverse events after Hartmann's reversal.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2011
Same author

Is there a post-PPH syndrome?

Techniques in coloproctology·2009
Same author

Improved postoperative outcomes with stentless aortic valve: a community hospital experience.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2003
Same author

Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2001
Same author

Rectal prolapse: a search for the "best" operation.

The American surgeon·2001
Same journal

Argon beam coagulation in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
Same journal

Endo-organ and laparoscopic management of gastric leiomyomas.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
Same journal

Laparoscopic treatment of duodenal diverticulum.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
Same journal

VATS-stepwise resection of a giant bulla in an oxygen-dependent patient.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
Same journal

Laparoscopic port site metastasis of an undetected primary tumor.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
Same journal

Right-sided colonic diverticulitis mimicking acute cholecystitis in pregnancy: case report and laparoscopic treatment.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
See all related articles

Laparoscopic colectomy shows comparable safety and effectiveness to open colectomy for colon cancer, with shorter hospital stays and lower costs. Long-term cancer outcomes require further study.

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Open colectomy has been the standard surgical treatment for colon cancer.
  • Advancements in laparoscopic techniques offer potential benefits for patients undergoing colectomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare laparoscopic colectomy (LC) versus open colectomy (OC).
  • To evaluate differences in morbidity, mortality, oncologic resection adequacy, operative time, recovery, and hospital costs.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis using a historical control group of OC patients.
  • Comparison of outcomes between LC and OC groups, including conversion rates from LC to OC.

Main Results:

  • No operative or perioperative mortalities in either group.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Adequate oncologic resection (clear margins, sufficient lymph node yield) achieved with LC.
  • Shorter postoperative hospital stay and lower total hospital costs observed in the LC group.
  • Slightly longer operative time for LC compared to OC.

    • Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic colectomy is a safe and cost-effective alternative to open colectomy for colon cancer.
    • LC provides adequate oncologic resection, but long-term cancer-specific data are essential.
    • Further research is needed to confirm long-term oncologic efficacy.