Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Early amniocentesis. What exactly does it mean?

M I Evans1, M P Johnson, W Holzgreve

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hutzel Hospital/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.

The Journal of Reproductive Medicine
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cell-free fetal DNA screening in the USA: a cost analysis of screening strategies.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2014
Same author

Impact of nuchal translucency credentialing by the FMF, the NTQR or both on screening distributions and performance.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2011
Same author

Chlamydia trachomatis: a practical obstetric/gynecologic management approach.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2010
Same author

Peeling back the onion on ultrasound abnormalities.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2009
Same author

Second-trimester sonographic soft markers: what can we learn from the experience of first-trimester nuchal translucency screening?

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2008
Same author

Anxiety among women who have undergone fertility therapy and who are considering multifetal pregnancy reduction: trends and implications.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians·2003
Same journal

Elective Procedures in Obstetrics and Gynecology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2022
Same journal

Choriocarcinoma in Situ in a Partial Hydatidiform Mole A: Case Report.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Isolated Recurrent Hematotrachelos After Abdominal Myomectomy A Case Report.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Live Birth from Electively Cryopreserved Oocytes: A Feasible Option for Couples Opposed to Embryo Cryopreservation A Case Report.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Ejaculation Failure on the Day of Operation Among Chinese Males Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technique Treatments.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
Same journal

Efficacy and Safety of Perioperative Use of Epinephrine for Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Infertile Women with Symptomatic Solitary Intramural Uterine Fibroids A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2018
See all related articles

Comparing early amniocentesis risks is challenging due to varying gestational ages. Defining procedures by gestational age allows for fairer risk comparisons in prenatal diagnostics.

Area of Science:

  • Perinatal medicine
  • Obstetrics
  • Prenatal diagnostics

Background:

  • Accurate risk assessment is crucial for invasive prenatal procedures.
  • Current comparisons of early amniocentesis risk rates are confounded by gestational age variations.
  • The total loss rate is significantly influenced by the gestational age at which the procedure is performed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations in comparing early amniocentesis risk rates.
  • To propose standardized definitions for early amniocentesis based on gestational age.
  • To enable fair and appropriate comparisons of procedural risks.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewing existing literature on amniocentesis procedures and outcomes.
  • Analyzing the relationship between gestational age and total loss rate.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developing a framework for classifying early amniocentesis by gestational age.

    • Main Results:

    • The term "early amniocentesis" encompasses a wide range of gestational ages (9-15 weeks).
    • Gestational age is a primary determinant of the total loss rate following amniocentesis.
    • A single risk rate for "early amniocentesis" is misleading due to this variability.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized definitions of amniocentesis by gestational age are necessary.
    • Implementing these definitions will facilitate accurate risk assessment and comparison.
    • This approach supports evidence-based decision-making in prenatal care.