Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Research and quality management studies: ethical considerations

Medsurg Nursing : Official Journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses

|April 1, 1994

Summary

Federal legislation mandates Institutional Review Board (IRB) oversight for federally funded human subjects research. Ethical principles guide IRB decisions, and similar standards are proposed for Quality Management (QM) studies to protect participants.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Communication from individuals with advanced DAT: can it provide clues to their sense of self-awareness and well-being?

Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)·2001

Same author

Restraint reduction: research utilization and case study with cognitive impairment.

Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)·1999

Same author

Communicating with individuals with dementia. The impaired person's perspective.

Journal of gerontological nursing·1999

Same author

Academic/practice collaboration for nursing research.

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·1994

Same author

Identifying fall risk factors in preparation for reducing the use of restraints.

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·1994

Same author

sing research methods in clinical practice.

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·1994

Area of Science:

Medical Ethics
Health Services Research
Quality Management

Background:

Federal legislation mandates Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to review human subjects research involving federal funding.
IRBs ensure protection of human rights through informed consent and adherence to ethical principles: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.
Current standards for Quality Management (QM) studies are less explicit, necessitating ethical guidance.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the applicability of existing ethical principles and IRB review standards to Quality Management (QM) studies.
To propose a framework for protecting human subjects in QM research.
To address ethical considerations for QM studies, including data privacy and confidentiality.

Main Methods:

Review of federal legislation and ethical guidelines for human subjects research.
Analysis of the ethical principles guiding Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).
Proposal of criteria for submitting QM studies to IRBs.

Main Results:

Existing ethical principles (respect for persons, beneficence, justice) can guide QM study ethical review.
Suggested criteria for IRB submission of QM studies include prospective design, scientific merit, and broader applicability.
Mechanisms for privacy, confidentiality, and consent are crucial even for studies using existing data.

Conclusions:

Quality Management (QM) studies involving human subjects should adopt ethical frameworks similar to traditional research.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) review is recommended for prospective QM studies with scientific merit or broader implications.
Ensuring participant privacy, confidentiality, and consent is paramount in all QM research, regardless of data source.

Keywords:

Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos