Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
A comparative study in patients with Omnicarbon and Björk-Shiley heart valve replacement
1Osaka National Hospital, Japan.
Insights
The Omnicarbon heart valve demonstrated comparable operative and hemodynamic results to the Björk-Shiley valve, though the latter showed a slightly better aortic closure to mitral opening click interval.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Device Engineering
Background:
- Mitral valve replacement is a critical procedure for managing severe mitral valve disease.
- Comparing prosthetic heart valves is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
- The Omnicarbon and Björk-Shiley valves represent different designs for mitral valve prostheses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical performance of the Omnicarbon heart valve against the Björk-Shiley spherical valve after mitral valve replacement.
- To evaluate operative results, hemodynamic parameters, and long-term outcomes for both valve types.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of patient data following mitral valve replacement with either Omnicarbon or Björk-Shiley valves.
- Assessment of early and late mortality, survival rates, and valve-related complications.
- Hemodynamic evaluation using pressure gradients, effective mitral valve areas, cardiac index, and Doppler echocardiography.
- Phonocardiographic analysis of valve click intervals (AC-OpC, Q-CC) and assessment of hemolysis.
Main Results:
- No early deaths were observed in either group; late deaths occurred in 6 Omnicarbon patients (2.9% per patient-year).
- Actuarial survival at 6 years was 82.1% for Omnicarbon, with 86.4% freedom from valve-related complications.
- Hemodynamic parameters at rest were satisfactory for both valves; however, Omnicarbon showed a significant decrease in cardiac index at 160 bpm.
- Regurgitant flow was noted in 28% of Omnicarbon patients versus 10% of Björk-Shiley patients at 160 bpm (p=ns).
- The Björk-Shiley valve demonstrated a statistically significant shorter aortic closure to mitral opening click (AC-OpC) interval (70.9 msec vs 76.8 msec, p < 0.05).
- Hemolysis was clinically insignificant in Omnicarbon valves with intact function.
Conclusions:
- Both Omnicarbon and Björk-Shiley valves provide satisfactory hemodynamic function post-mitral valve replacement.
- The Björk-Shiley valve exhibited a slight advantage in the AC-OpC interval, suggesting potentially better valve dynamics.
- Long-term survival and complication rates were comparable, indicating acceptable performance for both prostheses, though further investigation into regurgitant flow differences may be warranted.
Abstract:
To compare the Omnicarbon heart valve and the Björk-Shiley spherical valve, operative results, hemodynamic parameters and late results were examined after mitral valve replacement. There were no early deaths, and 6 late deaths in the Omnicarbon valve (2.9% per patient-year). The actuarial survival rate at 6 years was 82.1 +/- 4.8% and freedom from valve-related complications was 86.4 +/- 2.2%. Pressure gradients and effective mitral valve areas at rest calculated by Gorlin's formula were satisfactory in both valve. Cardiac index (l/min/m2) was slightly changed according to the pacer-induced tachycardia, but there was a significant decrease in 160 bpm in the Omnicarbon valve (2.01 vs 2.39, p < 0.05). Peak pressure gradients and pressure half time by Doppler echocardiography, revealed the same trends as those of the Björk-Shiley valve during tachycardiac exercise, though regurgitant flow was detected in 7 patients in 160 bpm in the Omnicarbon valve, while in 2 in the Björk-Shiley valve (28% vs 10%, p = ns). Phonocardiographic study demonstrated that aortic closure to mitral opening click (AC-OpC) interval and Q wave of the electrocardiogram to mitral closing click (Q-CC) interval, which were related to the mitral valve gradients, fell within the normal range in both valves. However, the Björk-Shiley valve compared favorable to the Omnicarbon valve in the AC-OpC interval (70.9 msec vs 76.8 msec, p < 0.05). Hemolysis was of no clinical importance in the intact function of the Omnicarbon valve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Related Concept Videos
Heart Valves
The AV valves prevent the backflow of blood from the ventricles to the atria during ventricular contraction. These valves function with the assistance of the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. When the ventricles are relaxed, the chordae tendineae are slack, allowing blood to flow from the atria into the...
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

